Globalization and the Messiness of Now


A conversation in the PEN America Journal between Amitava Kumar and Ilija Trojanow includes the following wonderful bit about the uselessness of Thomas Friedman and the 12th century trade routes of the Indian Ocean — brought up in a discussion of Amitav Ghosh’s In An Antique Land.

Trojanow: … So I suppose I have learned from Indian writers the width of freedom that one has as an artist in this world, so long as you refuse to acknowledge cultural boundaries that other people build up.

Kumar: That’s beautiful. Ghosh’s book In an Antique Land is a great example of that. It follows two parallel narratives, both describing Indians in Egypt. The first begins in 1148 and the second in 1980. In the first, a slave from India is serving an Arab master and going to Arabia. Eight hundred years later this document about him is discovered in the Cairo Geniza, in a synagogue, because the man was Jewish. Of course, the document doesn’t become intelligible until someone takes it to Princeton after the Second World War. And then a young scholar at Oxford, Amitav Ghosh, finds it. He sees this Indian name and thinks he’s entitled to visit the Geniza to research its origins. In going there and in learning the Egyptian language, he meets these new migrants, devout Muslims who act as his guides as he, a Hindu, pieces together the journey of the slave from India to Egypt. These migrants later leave to work in Iraq.

This enormous mix of things confuses us because we don’t have a sense of history. Read, say, Thomas Friedman, who says that the world is flat, and you’d think that globalization was suddenly discovered by Thomas Friedman when he woke up one day. But globalization did not happen yesterday, and global exchange and global commerce and the sharing of goods and bodily fluids across all kinds of boundaries happened in other centuries too, often in easier ways.

Trojanow: That’s one of the myths of globalization. Samuel Huntington is ignorant beyond belief when he says that, in today’s world, suddenly cultures are coming together. The Indian Ocean, for example, was one big area of interaction, throughout many, many centuries. It was much easier for someone, say, three hundred years ago, living on the seaboard of the Indian Ocean, to have cultural exchange with someone else than it is today. For an Omani trader, or a Persian trader, or an Indian trader, or an Indonesian trader, there were certain highways—very seaworthy routes—defined by the monsoon. And today it’s quite difficult for a trader from Bihar to go to Mombasa, for example. He needs a passport, which in India is not easy. Then he needs a visa, which is even more difficult. And then he needs to save money for a plane ticket, which is almost impossible if he’s a small-town trader.

Worlds separate as they seem to come together; foreign students and young Syrians in internet cafes in Damascus talk to friends and relatives across the globe on Skype and we think communication is the key here — the two are more and more alike, dressing more and more alike, riveted by their online social networks, talking the world over. But in the livelihoods of the foreigner and the local disparties grow — the foreigner might leave Syria often, for weekend holidays, to Beirut or the Dead Sea, or even farther south, to the country whose stamp will deny you reentry into Syria — while the latter maybe never leaves, because he is harassed at the airport, or simply cannot afford it, and most certainly cannot enter Palestine. Travel eases for some while it constricts for others, and the world doesn’t flatten.

3 thoughts on “Globalization and the Messiness of Now

  1. Huntington never said that “in today’s world, suddenly cultures are coming together.”

    In fact, his argument was that, with the decline of Cold War ideological conflict, the world would be returning to an earlier pattern in which civilizational divisions would be important to the interaction of nation-states.

  2. I think Tojanow’s snipe at Huntington may have more accurately referred to a quote like this:

    “In the politics of civilizations, the people and governments of non-Western civilizations no longer remain the objects of history as targets of Western colonialism but join the West as movers and shapers of history.”
    http://history.club.fatih.edu.tr/103%20Huntington%20Clash%20of%20Civilizations%20full%20text.htm

    In the case of Indian ocean trade routes, for one, a whole collection of people (merchants from Cairo, Aden, and the Malabar coast.. who were Muslim, Hindu, and Jewish) were the movers here — the interactions in this area of the world debunk the myth in Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations that until the end of the Cold War, only the West progressed history. His was a short-sighted view of things, centered on the recent few hundred year history of the West, ignoring wholesale the fruits and complexities of non-Western cultural relationships, economies and interactions (as highlighted in one example by the 12th century Indian Ocean) and describing all that simply as another, lesser “civilization.”

  3. That’s a helpful clarification. Thanks. It’s certainly a very different critique than the belief that Huntington thought “cultures are coming together” only in the modern era.

    However, I think this is also a misreading of Huntington, as he agreed with you about the role of non-Western civilizations throughout history.

    Your quotation comes from a passage in which Huntington was specifically referring to events only in the last few hundred years, and arguing that conflicts in this period involving the West had been primarily among Western powers. In contrast, he said, he believed we’re moving into a new phase of modern history, in which the Western powers will be involved not primarily in conflicts with each other, but also with non-Western nations and peoples.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s